State v. Glover

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Glover

610 So. 2d 439, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 7, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2119, 1992 WL 381761

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 24, 1992

DocketNo. 79883

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 610 So. 2d 439 (State v. Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Glover, 610 So. 2d 439, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 7, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2119, 1992 WL 381761 (Fla. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Glover v. State, 596 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), because of conflict with Lamont v. State, 597 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1992), quashed, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992), on the issue of whether life felonies are subject to enhancement under the Habitual Felony Offender Act, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). We have jurisdiction, Article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and approve the decision under review based on our decision in Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992), in which we approved the First District Court of Appeal’s resolution of the issue.

It is so ordered.

[440]*440BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Glover v. State, 596 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), because of conflict with Lamont v. State, 597 So.2d 823 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1992), quashed, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992), on the issue of whether life felonies are subject to enhancement under the Habitual Felony Offender Act, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). We have jurisdiction, Article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and approve the decision under review based on our decision in Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992), in which we approved the First District Court of Appeal’s resolution of the issue.

It is so ordered.

[440]*440BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

610 So. 2d 439, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 7, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2119, 1992 WL 381761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-glover-fla-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack