State v. Glenn

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Glenn

332 So. 2d 760, 1976 La. LEXIS 4827

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 4, 1976

DocketNo. 57465

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 332 So. 2d 760 (State v. Glenn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Glenn, 332 So. 2d 760, 1976 La. LEXIS 4827 (La. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Larry Glenn was charged by bill of information with the simple burglary of a building belonging to Badeaux’s Sup-erette in Marrero, Louisiana on July 28, 1975. La.R.S. 14:62. He was tried by jury on September 12, 1975, found guilty, and subsequently sentenced to two years imprisonment. Relying on one assignment of error,¹ defendant Glenn appeals his conviction and sentence.

Defendant contends that the trial judge erred in failing to grant his motion for a new trial on the basis that the jury was not properly sequestered during its deliberations. C.Cr.P. art. 791. We have carefully considered defendant’s contention and reviewed the record and transcript presented with it. We conclude that the assignment of error lacks merit. Further, we find no errors which are discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings. C.Cr.P. art. 920.

Accordingly, defendant Glenn’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Larry Glenn was charged by bill of information with the simple burglary of a building belonging to Badeaux’s Sup-erette in Marrero, Louisiana on July 28, 1975. La.R.S. 14:62. He was tried by jury on September 12, 1975, found guilty, and subsequently sentenced to two years imprisonment. Relying on one assignment of error,¹ defendant Glenn appeals his conviction and sentence.

Defendant contends that the trial judge erred in failing to grant his motion for a new trial on the basis that the jury was not properly sequestered during its deliberations. C.Cr.P. art. 791. We have carefully considered defendant’s contention and reviewed the record and transcript presented with it. We conclude that the assignment of error lacks merit. Further, we find no errors which are discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings. C.Cr.P. art. 920.

Accordingly, defendant Glenn’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

332 So. 2d 760, 1976 La. LEXIS 4827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-glenn-la-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack