State v. Glasco

140 So. 3d 702, 2014 WL 2616520, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9096
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 2014
DocketNo. 5D11-851
StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 3d 702 (State v. Glasco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Glasco, 140 So. 3d 702, 2014 WL 2616520, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9096 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PER CURIAM.

Based on the Florida Supreme Court’s recent decision in Glasco v. State, No. SC12-1292, 2014 WL 1622186 (Fla.2014), which quashed this court’s decision in State v. Glasco, 90 So.3d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012), we withdraw the mandate issued July 9, 2012, and our previously-entered opinion and hereby affirm the decision of the circuit court granting the motion to suppress.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER, and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ricardo Hermon Glasco v. State of Florida
137 So. 3d 1014 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)
State v. Glasco
90 So. 3d 905 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 So. 3d 702, 2014 WL 2616520, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-glasco-fladistctapp-2014.