State v. Glasby

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Glasby

DecidedJanuary 11, 2007

Docket2007-UP-011

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Glasby (State v. Glasby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Glasby, (S.C. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Appellant,

v.

Henri A. Glasby, Respondent.

Appeal From Horry County
G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-011
Submitted January 1, 2007 Filed January 11, 2007

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapaport, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Henri A. Glasby was convicted of trafficking cocaine and trafficking crack cocaine. Glasby appeals his convictions arguing the court erred in refusing to suppress evidence.

We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Burton, 356 S.C. 259, 265, 589 S.E.2d 6, 9 (2003) (finding a motion for a directed verdict is limited to the sufficiency of properly admitted evidence, not is admissibility); State v. Owens, 346 S.C. 637, 651, 552 S.E.2d 745, 752-53 (2001), overruled on other grounds, State v. Gentry, 363 S.C. 93, 610 S.E.2d 494 (2005) (finding a ruling in a pre-trial suppression hearing is not final and an objection must be made at the time the evidence is introduced).

AFFIRMED.

GOOLSBY, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Appellant,

v.

Henri A. Glasby, Respondent.

Appeal From Horry County
G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-011
Submitted January 1, 2007 Filed January 11, 2007

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapaport, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Henri A. Glasby was convicted of trafficking cocaine and trafficking crack cocaine. Glasby appeals his convictions arguing the court erred in refusing to suppress evidence.

We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Burton, 356 S.C. 259, 265, 589 S.E.2d 6, 9 (2003) (finding a motion for a directed verdict is limited to the sufficiency of properly admitted evidence, not is admissibility); State v. Owens, 346 S.C. 637, 651, 552 S.E.2d 745, 752-53 (2001), overruled on other grounds, State v. Gentry, 363 S.C. 93, 610 S.E.2d 494 (2005) (finding a ruling in a pre-trial suppression hearing is not final and an objection must be made at the time the evidence is introduced).

AFFIRMED.

GOOLSBY, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Glasby, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-glasby-scctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack