State v. Gladstone

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Gladstone

325 So. 2d 443, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15252

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 1976

DocketNo. 75-1160

StatusPublished

This text of 325 So. 2d 443 (State v. Gladstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gladstone, 325 So. 2d 443, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15252 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are presented with a petition for certiorari directed to an order of the trial court which ordered and adjudged that $750 “in counsel fees shall now be paid by the State of Florida to Donald Bierman, Esq., for his representation of the above-named child.”

We have considered this petition for cer-tiorari as an appeal and finding no authority in law for the entry of said order we, therefore, are required to reverse the same. See Dade County v. McCrary, Fla.App. 1972, 260 So.2d 543.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are presented with a petition for certiorari directed to an order of the trial court which ordered and adjudged that $750 “in counsel fees shall now be paid by the State of Florida to Donald Bierman, Esq., for his representation of the above-named child.”

We have considered this petition for cer-tiorari as an appeal and finding no authority in law for the entry of said order we, therefore, are required to reverse the same. See Dade County v. McCrary, Fla.App. 1972, 260 So.2d 543.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 So. 2d 443, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gladstone-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack