State v. Giugliano

512 P.3d 721, 151 Haw. 355
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2022·No. CAAP-20-0000530·Published

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 30-JUN-2022 07:55 AM Dkt. 59 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RYAN M. GIUGLIANO, Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT NORTH AND SOUTH KONA DIVISION (CASE NO. 3DTA-19-03328)

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and McCullen, JJ.)

Defendant-Appellant Ryan M. Giugliano (Giugliano)

appeals from the District Court of the Third Circuit's1

July 29, 2020 Judgment and Notice of Entry of Judgment, convicting him of Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence of an

Intoxicant (OVUII), in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS)

§ 291E-61(a)(1) (2020), as a second offense within ten years of a

prior OVUII conviction, subjecting him to enhanced sentencing

pursuant to HRS § 291E-61(b)(2) (2020).2

1 The Honorable Margaret K. Masunaga presided. 2 HRS § 291E-61 provides as follows: (a) A person commits the offense of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant if the person operates or assumes actual physical control of a vehicle:

(1) While under the influence of alcohol in an amount sufficient to impair the person's normal (continued...) NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

On appeal, Giugliano contends there was insufficient

evidence to convict him of OVUII and demonstrate a prior

conviction for OVUII within the prior ten years of the instant

offense.

Upon careful review of the record and the briefs

submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to

the arguments advanced and the issues raised, we resolve

Giugliano's contentions as follows, and reverse.

Hawai#i County Police Department Officer Michael Collings (Officer Collings) testified that he responded to a one-

moped accident fronting the Ali#i Lani Condominiums (Ali#i Lani)

on October 29, 2019, at approximately 1:00 in the afternoon.

When he arrived on the scene, he observed medics attempting to

speak with Giugliano.

Officer Collings first made contact with the witness

who reported the accident, Matt Flugy (Flugy). Flugy provided

Officer Collings with the keys to the moped and a bottle of

medication prescribed to Giugliano.

While Officer Collings spoke with Flugy, Giugliano "had

pushed the moped farther north through the parking lot and [was]

2 (...continued) mental faculties or ability to care for the person and guard against casualty; . . . .

(b) A person committing the offense of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant shall be sentenced without possibility of probation or suspension of sentence as follows: . . . .

(2) For an offense that occurs within ten years of a prior conviction for an offense under this section[.]

2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

detained by Officer Toloumu . . . ." After speaking with Flugy,

Officer Collings went over to Giugliano and saw that the moped

was damaged on both sides. Giugliano was uncooperative and only

provided his first name, but a registered owner check of the

moped came back as belonging to Giugliano.

Officer Collings testified that Giugliano was unsteady

on his feet, swayed back and forth, stumbled a little bit, and

had a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage emanating from his

breath. At the police station, Officer Collings observed that Giugliano had glassy eyes and dilated pupils.

Officer Collings obtained video surveillance from

cameras pointing at the entrance of Ali#i Lani and north through

its parking lot. Officer Collings testified that the video

showed Giugliano walking into the parking lot with no moped.

The video then showed Flugy pushing a moped from Ali#i Drive into

the parking lot. Giugliano returned near the entrance, took the

moped, and pushed it through the parking lot until he was stopped

by an officer.

Officer Collings also testified that Ali#i Drive is a public road and that traffic can freely enter and exit the Ali#i

Lani parking lot: [Deputy Prosecuting Attorney (DPA):] Oh, I have one further question actually. Um, is Ali#i Drive a, um, public road?

[Officer Collings:] Yes, it is. [DPA:] And, um, is there any, uh, kind of locked gate or fence, um, at the entrance of the [Ali#i] Lani condo complex?

[Officer Collings:] No, there is not. [DPA:] Can traffic, um, foot and vehicle traffic come and go freely from that parking lot? [Officer Collings:] Yes.

3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

A copy of the surveillance video was admitted into evidence.

Flugy did not testify. After reviewing the evidence and finding

Officer Collings credible, the district court adjudged Giugliano

guilty.

Here, the State was required to prove beyond a

reasonable doubt that Giugliano "operate[d] or assume[d] actual

physical control of a vehicle . . . [w]hile under the influence

of alcohol in an amount sufficient to impair the person's normal

mental faculties or ability to care for the person and guard against casualty[.]" HRS § 291E-61(a)(1). "Operate" means "to

drive or assume actual physical control of a vehicle upon a

public way, street, road, or highway . . ." and "[p]ublic way,

street, road, or highway" includes a "parking lot, when any part

thereof is open for use by the public or to which the public is

invited for entertainment or business purposes[.]" HRS § 291E-1

(2020) (emphases added).

The dispositive question here is whether there was

sufficient evidence to support a conclusion that Giugliano

operated his moped on a public way, street, road, or highway. State v. Wheeler, 121 Hawai#i 383, 393, 219 P.3d 1170, 1180

(2009) (holding that "the operation of a vehicle on a public way,

street, road, or highway is an attendant circumstance of the

offense of OVUII, and is therefore an element of the offense").

The test on appeal is whether, viewing the evidence in the

strongest light for the prosecution, "there was substantial

evidence to support" the district court's conclusion. State v.

Matavale, 115 Hawai#i 149, 157-58, 166 P.3d 322, 330-31 (2007).

Substantial evidence is "credible evidence which is of sufficient

4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

quality and probative value to enable [a person] of reasonable

caution to support a conclusion. And as trier of fact, the trial

judge is free to make all reasonable and rational inferences

under the facts in evidence, including circumstantial evidence."

Id. at 158, 166 P.3d at 331 (citation omitted).

Even when considering the evidence in the strongest

light for the State, there was insufficient evidence to support

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Giugliano, 512 P.3d 721, 151 Haw. 355 (hawapp 2022).

512 P.3d 721 (State v. Giugliano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Matavale
166 P.3d 322 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Wheeler
219 P.3d 1170 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2009)
State v. Abel.
341 P.3d 539 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2014)