State v. Girolomoni

554 A.2d 743, 210 Conn. 804, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 42
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 12, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 554 A.2d 743 (State v. Girolomoni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Girolomoni, 554 A.2d 743, 210 Conn. 804, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 42 (Colo. 1989).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. '245, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court err in affirming the defendant’s conviction and holding that the wiretap panel’s [805]*805failure to make a written determination of probable cause, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 54-41d (7) and 51-41e, that a special need existed to intercept wire communications over a public telephone was not reversible error?”

Michael J. McClary, in support of the petition. Harry Weller, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided January 12, 1989

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
554 A.2d 743, 210 Conn. 804, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-girolomoni-conn-1989.