State v. Ginter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Ginter

120 P.3d 1259, 202 Or. App. 207, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1325

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 12, 2005

Docket0504-64284; A128440

StatusPublished

This text of 120 P.3d 1259 (State v. Ginter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ginter, 120 P.3d 1259, 202 Or. App. 207, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1325 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals a judgment adjudicating him to be a mentally ill person and committing him to the Department of Human Services for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he meets the statutory definition of a “mentally ill person” under ORS 426.005(1). The state concedes that point and submits that the judgment should be reversed. Upon de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals a judgment adjudicating him to be a mentally ill person and committing him to the Department of Human Services for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he meets the statutory definition of a “mentally ill person” under ORS 426.005(1). The state concedes that point and submits that the judgment should be reversed. Upon de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 P.3d 1259, 202 Or. App. 207, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ginter-orctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack