State v. Ginardi

273 A.2d 353, 57 N.J. 438, 1971 N.J. LEXIS 297
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 8, 1971·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion filed in the Appellate Division, 111 N. J. Super. 435.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ginardi, 273 A.2d 353, 57 N.J. 438, 1971 N.J. LEXIS 297 (N.J. 1971).

273 A.2d 353 (State v. Ginardi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lazo
34 A.3d 1233 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)
Commonwealth v. Beale
665 A.2d 473 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Harrison v. Commonwealth
384 S.E.2d 813 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1989)
Commonwealth v. Thornley
509 N.E.2d 908 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1987)
State v. Johnson
524 A.2d 826 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
State v. D.R.
214 N.J. Super. 278 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
State v. Masino
466 A.2d 955 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Commonwealth v. Weichell
453 N.E.2d 1038 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1983)
State v. Packard
439 A.2d 983 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1981)
State v. Rich
305 N.W.2d 739 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1981)
State v. Wooten
342 A.2d 549 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
State v. Hampton
294 A.2d 23 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1972)