State v. Gilmore

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Gilmore

57 Mo. 280

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedAugust 15, 1874

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 Mo. 280 (State v. Gilmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gilmore, 57 Mo. 280 (Mo. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Wag-Nek, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the.court.

The defendant was a justice of the Buchanan County Court; ami was indicted for voting for an appropriation not directed or warranted by law. The court sustained a demurrer to the indictment.

The case is essentially the same as that of the State vs. Piuger decided at this term, and according to that decision the judgment must be affirmed.

The other judges concur, except Judge Sherwood who is absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wag-Nek, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the.court.

The defendant was a justice of the Buchanan County Court; ami was indicted for voting for an appropriation not directed or warranted by law. The court sustained a demurrer to the indictment.

The case is essentially the same as that of the State vs. Piuger decided at this term, and according to that decision the judgment must be affirmed.

The other judges concur, except Judge Sherwood who is absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Mo. 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gilmore-mo-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack