State v. Gillyard
97 S.E.2d 890, 246 N.C. 217, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 405
Opinion
Defendant’s motion to nonsuit and other assignments of error revolve around the failure of the State to establish that the alleged crime was committed on the date specified in the bill of indictment. The failure of the State to establish that the crime was committed on 27 March as alleged in the bill of indictment does not relieve defendant from responsibility for his criminal act. Time was not of the essence. S. v. Trippe, 222 N.C. 600, 24 S.E. 2d 340.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Gillyard, 97 S.E.2d 890, 246 N.C. 217, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 405 (N.C. 1957).
97 S.E.2d 890 (State v. Gillyard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Summitt
263 S.E.2d 612 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
State v. Davis
191 S.E.2d 664 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Whittemore
122 S.E.2d 396 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)