State v. Gilliehan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gilliehan

185 S.W.3d 238, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 2006 WL 163217

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 24, 2006

DocketED 85634

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 S.W.3d 238 (State v. Gilliehan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gilliehan, 185 S.W.3d 238, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 2006 WL 163217 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Farlin Gilliehan (“Defendant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County convicting him, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree (Count I), section 569.170 RSMo 2000, 1 stealing of $500 or more (Count II), section 570.030, RSMo (Supp.2002), stealing of firearms (Count IV), section 570.030, and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use (Count V), section 195.233. Defendant was sentenced as a persistent offender to one year of imprisonment for Count V and fifteen years of imprisonment for each of the other three counts of which he was convicted. All sentences were ordered to run concurrently with each other. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Farlin Gilliehan (“Defendant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County convicting him, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree (Count I), section 569.170 RSMo 2000, 1 stealing of $500 or more (Count II), section 570.030, RSMo (Supp.2002), stealing of firearms (Count IV), section 570.030, and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use (Count V), section 195.233. Defendant was sentenced as a persistent offender to one year of imprisonment for Count V and fifteen years of imprisonment for each of the other three counts of which he was convicted. All sentences were ordered to run concurrently with each other. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 S.W.3d 238, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 88, 2006 WL 163217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gilliehan-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack