State v. Gillard

714 N.E.2d 400, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1448, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2607
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Gillard. Read the opinion of the Court — 78 Ohio St. 3d 548
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 12, 1999·No. 98-1157·Published

Opinion

Stark App. No. CA6701. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the [1449]*1449execution of sentence in Supreme Court case No. 96-221, appellant’s direct appeal of his conviction, pending the timely filing and final disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States,

IT IS ORDERED that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the execution of sentence be, and the same is hereby, stayed, pending the timely filing and final disposition of the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.

F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gillard, 714 N.E.2d 400, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1448, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2607 (Ohio 1999).

714 N.E.2d 400 (State v. Gillard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.