State v. Gill
This text of 489 S.E.2d 478 (State v. Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision denying petitioner relief, by a vote of two-to-one, on his Batson 1 claim. State v. Gill, 319 S.C. 283, 460 S.E.2d 412 (Ct.App.1995). We find the Court of Appeals erred in reaching the Batson “mixed motive” issue because it was not properly preserved for appeal, never having been raised to or ruled upon by the trial judge, see, e.g., Smith v. Phillips, 318 S.C. 453, 458 S.E.2d 427 (1995).
Accordingly, we vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals, and affirm petitioner’s conviction.
. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
489 S.E.2d 478, 327 S.C. 253, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gill-sc-1997.