State v. Gill

489 S.E.2d 478, 327 S.C. 253, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 158
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 11, 1997
Docket24670
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 489 S.E.2d 478 (State v. Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gill, 489 S.E.2d 478, 327 S.C. 253, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 158 (S.C. 1997).

Opinion

*254 PER CURIAM:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision denying petitioner relief, by a vote of two-to-one, on his Batson 1 claim. State v. Gill, 319 S.C. 283, 460 S.E.2d 412 (Ct.App.1995). We find the Court of Appeals erred in reaching the Batson “mixed motive” issue because it was not properly preserved for appeal, never having been raised to or ruled upon by the trial judge, see, e.g., Smith v. Phillips, 318 S.C. 453, 458 S.E.2d 427 (1995).

Accordingly, we vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals, and affirm petitioner’s conviction.

1

. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Calvin
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2010
State v. Myers
596 S.E.2d 488 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2004)
State v. Hughes
521 S.E.2d 500 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1999)
Payton v. Kearse
495 S.E.2d 205 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 S.E.2d 478, 327 S.C. 253, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gill-sc-1997.