State v. Giles

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Giles

231 P. 1118, 113 Or. 253, 1925 Ore. LEXIS 197

DecidedJanuary 15, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 231 P. 1118 (State v. Giles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Giles, 231 P. 1118, 113 Or. 253, 1925 Ore. LEXIS 197 (Or. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

McBRIDE, O. J.

The appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Multnomah County of the crime of murder in the second degree. From such judgment he appeals to this court.

No bill of exceptions has been filed in this appeal, and, while the brief discloses several alleged errors, we cannot consider them in the absence of a bill of *254 exceptions. This leaves nothing bnt the sufficiency of the indictment and the jurisdiction of the court to be considered upon appeal, and these sufficiently appear.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Burnett, Band and Coshow, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McBRIDE, O. J.

The appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Multnomah County of the crime of murder in the second degree. From such judgment he appeals to this court.

No bill of exceptions has been filed in this appeal, and, while the brief discloses several alleged errors, we cannot consider them in the absence of a bill of *254 exceptions. This leaves nothing bnt the sufficiency of the indictment and the jurisdiction of the court to be considered upon appeal, and these sufficiently appear.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Burnett, Band and Coshow, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 P. 1118, 113 Or. 253, 1925 Ore. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-giles-or-1925.