State v. Giles

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Giles

353 S.W.3d 474, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1617, 2011 WL 6029759

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 6, 2011

DocketWD 73117

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 353 S.W.3d 474 (State v. Giles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Giles, 353 S.W.3d 474, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1617, 2011 WL 6029759 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Terry Giles appeals from his conviction by jury of one count of second degree murder, § 565.021, and one count of armed criminal action, § 571.015. Giles was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment on the murder count to be served concurrently with a term of twenty-five years on the armed criminal action count. The issue raised was not properly preserved for appellate review, and we perceive of no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice warranting plain error review. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Terry Giles appeals from his conviction by jury of one count of second degree murder, § 565.021, and one count of armed criminal action, § 571.015. Giles was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment on the murder count to be served concurrently with a term of twenty-five years on the armed criminal action count. The issue raised was not properly preserved for appellate review, and we perceive of no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice warranting plain error review. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 S.W.3d 474, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1617, 2011 WL 6029759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-giles-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack