State v. Gilcrease

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gilcrease

567 S.W.3d 298

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106195

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 567 S.W.3d 298 (State v. Gilcrease) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gilcrease, 567 S.W.3d 298 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ralph V. Gilcrease appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, two counts of second-degree statutory sodomy, one count of enticement of a child, one count of first-degree child molestation, and two counts of second-degree child molestation. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ralph V. Gilcrease appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, two counts of second-degree statutory sodomy, one count of enticement of a child, one count of first-degree child molestation, and two counts of second-degree child molestation. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 S.W.3d 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gilcrease-moctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack