State v. Gilchrist

961 So. 2d 1043, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11003, 2007 WL 2065829
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 20, 2007·No. No. 5D06-2967·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Carter, 835 So.2d 259, 262 (Fla.2002) (holding “[t]he trial court is in a better position to identify the probation violator’s motive, intent, and attitude and assess whether the violation is both willful and substantial.”).

PALMER, C.J., THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gilchrist, 961 So. 2d 1043, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11003, 2007 WL 2065829 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

961 So. 2d 1043 (State v. Gilchrist) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Carter
835 So. 2d 259 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)