State v. Gilbert

2009 Ohio 6543, 124 Ohio St. 3d 119
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 17, 2009·No. 2009-0610·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to appellant’s first assignment of error below (Proposition of Law No. I accepted for review in this court) on the authority of State v. Lester, 123 Ohio St.3d 396, 2009-Ohio-4225, 916 *120 N.E.2d 1038. The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings not inconsistent with State v. Lester.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa Reitz Williamson and Kristen L. Sobieski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gilbert, 2009 Ohio 6543, 124 Ohio St. 3d 119 (Ohio 2009).

2009 Ohio 6543 (State v. Gilbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laurice Gilbert v. Terry Tibbals
593 F. App'x 494 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)