State v. Gieselman

887 S.W.2d 631, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1444, 1994 WL 494074
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 13, 1994·No. No. 65181·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals the trial court’s granting defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the jury verdict finding defendant guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree, § 564.011, RSMol986. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value [632]*632nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gieselman, 887 S.W.2d 631, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1444, 1994 WL 494074 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

887 S.W.2d 631 (State v. Gieselman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campos v. Nueces County
162 S.W.3d 778 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)