State v. Gibson

144 S.E.2d 402, 265 N.C. 487, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1019
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 20, 1965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PeR CxjRiam.

On appeal, defendant assigns as error (1) that the two-year sentence is excessive in that other prisoners charged with escape had received shorter sentences, and (2) that he is suffering “double punishment” because, in addition to the said two-year sentence, his said escape, under the rules and regulations of the Prison Department, caused him to lose “all the good time” credit he had earned on the sentence he was serving at the time of his escape. Obviously, the simple statement of defendant’s contentions discloses they are wholly without merit. Further discussion is unnecessary. Hence, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gibson, 144 S.E.2d 402, 265 N.C. 487, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1019 (N.C. 1965).

144 S.E.2d 402 (State v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McClinton
200 S.E.2d 197 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)