State v. Gibson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gibson

520 S.W.3d 839, 2017 WL 2853056, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 678

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 2017·No. WD 79354·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Appellant Willie Gibson was convicted of murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and two counts of armed criminal action. Gibson appeals. He argues that the circuit court plainly erred in admitting into evidence an incriminating letter he wrote while in jail, because (according to Gibson) the letter was insufficiently authenticated. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Appellant Willie Gibson was convicted of murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and two counts of armed criminal action. Gibson appeals. He argues that the circuit court plainly erred in admitting into evidence an incriminating letter he wrote while in jail, because (according to Gibson) the letter was insufficiently authenticated. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Gibson, 520 S.W.3d 839, 2017 WL 2853056, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 678 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

520 S.W.3d 839 (State v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.