State v. Gibson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gibson

488 S.W.3d 743, 2016 WL 2338676, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 452

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 2016·No. WD 78588·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Dustin Gibson appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of third-degree assault of a law. enforcement officer, § 565.083, first-degree tampering, § 569.080, and resisting a lawful stop, § 575.150, for which he was sentenced to a total of nineteen years’ imprisonment. Gibson argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his tampering conviction and that, when sentencing Gibson, the trial court improperly punished him for exercising his right to trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Dustin Gibson appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of third-degree assault of a law. enforcement officer, § 565.083, first-degree tampering, § 569.080, and resisting a lawful stop, § 575.150, for which he was sentenced to a total of nineteen years’ imprisonment. Gibson argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his tampering conviction and that, when sentencing Gibson, the trial court improperly punished him for exercising his right to trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Gibson, 488 S.W.3d 743, 2016 WL 2338676, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

488 S.W.3d 743 (State v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.