State v. Gibbs

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Gibbs

620 So. 2d 296, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2312, 1993 WL 197947

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 8, 1993

DocketNo. K93-244

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 620 So. 2d 296 (State v. Gibbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gibbs, 620 So. 2d 296, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2312, 1993 WL 197947 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

WRIT DENIED: The trial court did not err in concluding that relator’s application did not state one of the exclusive grounds for granting post-conviction relief contained in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3. The legislature has set forth limited grounds for granting post-conviction relief. Review of a sentence for excessiveness is not provided for by La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.3. Although an excessive sentence may be a violation of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, subsection (1) of art. 930.3 specifically limits review to those instances where “the conviction was obtained in violation of the constitution ...”.

The legislature has provided a means for review of sentences, whether excessive or [297]*297illegal, by appeal. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 881.1 through 882 and art. 912. Relator may seek an out-of-time appeal of his sentence. State v. Counterman, 475 So.2d 336 (La.1985).

Accordingly, we deny relator’s application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

WRIT DENIED: The trial court did not err in concluding that relator’s application did not state one of the exclusive grounds for granting post-conviction relief contained in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3. The legislature has set forth limited grounds for granting post-conviction relief. Review of a sentence for excessiveness is not provided for by La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.3. Although an excessive sentence may be a violation of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, subsection (1) of art. 930.3 specifically limits review to those instances where “the conviction was obtained in violation of the constitution ...”.

The legislature has provided a means for review of sentences, whether excessive or [297]*297illegal, by appeal. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 881.1 through 882 and art. 912. Relator may seek an out-of-time appeal of his sentence. State v. Counterman, 475 So.2d 336 (La.1985).

Accordingly, we deny relator’s application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

620 So. 2d 296, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2312, 1993 WL 197947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gibbs-lactapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack