State v. Gibbs

620 So. 2d 296, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2312, 1993 WL 197947
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 8, 1993·No. No. K93-244·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

ORDER

WRIT DENIED: The trial court did not err in concluding that relator’s application did not state one of the exclusive grounds for granting post-conviction relief contained in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3. The legislature has set forth limited grounds for granting post-conviction relief. Review of a sentence for excessiveness is not provided for by La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.3. Although an excessive sentence may be a violation of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, subsection (1) of art. 930.3 specifically limits review to those instances where “the conviction was obtained in violation of the constitution ...”.

The legislature has provided a means for review of sentences, whether excessive or [297]*297illegal, by appeal. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 881.1 through 882 and art. 912. Relator may seek an out-of-time appeal of his sentence. State v. Counterman, 475 So.2d 336 (La.1985).

Accordingly, we deny relator’s application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gibbs, 620 So. 2d 296, 1993 La. App. LEXIS 2312, 1993 WL 197947 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

620 So. 2d 296 (State v. Gibbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montgomery v. Louisiana
577 U.S. 190 (Supreme Court, 2016)
Davis v. Cain
44 F. Supp. 2d 792 (E.D. Louisiana, 1999)
State v. Johnson
729 So. 2d 55 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
State Ex Rel. Melinie v. State
665 So. 2d 1172 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
State v. Gibbs
626 So. 2d 1165 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1993)