State v. Getz

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Getz. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Haw. 19
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 2013·No. SCWC-12-0000009·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000009 01-JUL-2013 08:32 AM

SCWC-12-0000009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

CHAD GETZ, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000009; CR. NO. 11-1-0608)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on May 17, 2013, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, July 1, 2013.

Summer M.M. Kupau /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Getz, (haw 2013).

State v. Getz (State v. Getz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.