State v. Gessert

21 Minn. 369, 1875 Minn. LEXIS 119
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMarch 25, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 21 Minn. 369 (State v. Gessert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gessert, 21 Minn. 369, 1875 Minn. LEXIS 119 (Mich. 1875).

Opinion

Beery, J.

The indictment in this case was found by a grand jury of Washington county, and charges the defendant with committing the crime of murder, by feloniously, etc., inflicting upon David Savazyo, on August 28, 1874, in said county, a stab and wound, of which, upon the same day, Savazyo died in the county of Pierce, and State of Wisconsin. The question in the case is whether the indictment charges the commission of an offence in the county of Washington.

It is for his acts that defendant is responsible. They constitute his offence. The place where they are committed, [370]*370must be the place where his offence is committed, and therefore the place where he should be indicted and tried. In this instance, the acts with which defendant is charged, to wit, the stabbing and wounding, were committed in Washington county. The death which ensued in Pierce county, though it went to characterize the acts committed in Washington county, was not an act of defendant, committed in Wisconsin, but the consequence of his acts committed in Washington county, against the peace and dignity of the State of Minnesota. We are therefore of opinion that the indictment charges the commission of the crime of murder in Washington county, and, upon the questions certified to this court by the court below, that the demurrer to the indictment should be overruled. Riley v. State, 9 Humph. 646 ; Com. v. Parker, 2 Pick. 550, 559 ; 1 East, P. C., ch. 5, § 128 ; Rex v. Burdett, 4 B. & Ald. 95, 173 ; Grosvenor v. Inhabitants etc., 12 East, 244; People v. Gill, 6 Cal. 637 ; State v. Carter, 3 Dutch. 499 ; 1 Hale, P. C., ch. 33 ; 1 Bish. Cr. Law, § 83; 1 Bish. Cr. Proc. § 67; 2 Wharton Cr. Law, § 1052.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Belloli
766 A.2d 928 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2001)
State v. Smith
421 N.W.2d 315 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1988)
State v. Johnson
228 N.W. 916 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1930)
Commonwealth v. Apkins
146 S.W. 431 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)
State v. Gruber
133 N.W. 571 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1911)
Roberson v. State
42 Fla. 212 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1900)
State v. Garrison
49 S.W. 508 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
Moore v. State
40 S.W. 287 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)
Debney v. State
34 L.R.A. 851 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Ex parte McNeeley
14 S.E. 436 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1892)
Archer v. State
7 N.E. 225 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Minn. 369, 1875 Minn. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gessert-minn-1875.