State v. Gerstenberger

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Gerstenberger

247 So. 2d 392, 258 La. 568, 1971 La. LEXIS 4424

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 13, 1971

DocketNo. 51384

StatusPublished

This text of 247 So. 2d 392 (State v. Gerstenberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gerstenberger, 247 So. 2d 392, 258 La. 568, 1971 La. LEXIS 4424 (La. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

[569]*569It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable John S. Covington, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 8th day of October, 1971, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondents through their attorneys shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

[569]*569It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable John S. Covington, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 8th day of October, 1971, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondents through their attorneys shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 So. 2d 392, 258 La. 568, 1971 La. LEXIS 4424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gerstenberger-la-1971.