State v. Gerrish

746 P.2d 762, 70 Utah Adv. Rep. 17, 1987 Utah LEXIS 809, 1987 WL 1736
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 19, 1987
Docket860159
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 746 P.2d 762 (State v. Gerrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gerrish, 746 P.2d 762, 70 Utah Adv. Rep. 17, 1987 Utah LEXIS 809, 1987 WL 1736 (Utah 1987).

Opinion

HALL, Chief Justice:

In September 1985, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated sexual abuse of a child, a first degree felony. 1 The crime is punishable by incarceration for a minimum mandatory term of three, six, or nine years. 2

In October 1985, defendant was sentenced to a minimum mandatory sentence of ten years. In November 1985, this erroneous sentence was amended without hearing to specify a minimum mandatory term of six years.

In February 1986, the trial court sua sponte resentenced defendant, with defendant and his counsel present. Defendant’s motion to have sections 76-5-404.1(4) and 76-3-406(1) declared unconstitutional was denied. Defendant was resentenced to a minimum mandatory term of six years.

On appeal, defendant claims that the minimum mandatory sentencing scheme set forth in Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-5-404.1(4) (1987), 76-3-201(5)-(10) (Supp.1985) (amended 1986 & 1987), 76-3-406(1) (Supp.1985) (amended 1986), and 77-27-9(2) (Supp.1985) (amended 1986) is unconstitutionally vague. In State v. Egbert, 3 we faced a similar challenge to the minimum mandatory sentencing requirements of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-405(2) (Supp.1983) (amended 1986) and § 76-3-201(5) (Supp.1983) (amended 1984, 1986, & 1987), and there the Court held the minimum mandatory provisions constitutional. The minimum mandatory sentencing scheme challenged in this case is substantively no different than that challenged in Egbert. 4 Therefore, our ruling in Egbert controls this appeal.

Defendant’s sentence is affirmed.

STEWART, Associate C.J., and HOWE, DURHAM and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.
1

. Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-404. l(3)-(4) (Supp.1987).

2

. Id. at -404.1(4); see also Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-3-201(5)-(10) (Supp.1985) (amended 1986 & 1987), -406 (Supp.1985) (amended 1986), 77-27-9(2) (Supp.1985) (amended 1986).

3

. 748 P.2d 558 (Utah 1987).

4

. See id. at 559, n. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lowder
889 P.2d 412 (Utah Supreme Court, 1994)
Gerrish v. Barnes
844 P.2d 315 (Utah Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Lorrah
761 P.2d 1388 (Utah Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Simmons
759 P.2d 1152 (Utah Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Shickles
760 P.2d 291 (Utah Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Larson
758 P.2d 901 (Utah Supreme Court, 1988)
Matthew v. Cook
754 P.2d 666 (Utah Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
746 P.2d 762, 70 Utah Adv. Rep. 17, 1987 Utah LEXIS 809, 1987 WL 1736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gerrish-utah-1987.