State v. George

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. George

738 So. 2d 1075, 1999 La. LEXIS 447, 1999 WL 123517

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 26, 1999·No. No. 98-KK-2802·Published

Opinion

IN RE: State of Louisiana; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writ; Parish of Union 3rd Judicial District Court Div. “B” Number 35,-269; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Number 32000-KW.

Granted. The decision of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the district court is reinstated. To the extent that the district court limited its ruling to preclude the defendant only from presenting any testimony concerning Lim-bic Psychotic Trigger Reaction or make “any mention thereof,” the court properly exercised its gatekeeping function under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, [1076]*1076Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN RE: State of Louisiana; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writ; Parish of Union 3rd Judicial District Court Div. “B” Number 35,-269; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Number 32000-KW.

Granted. The decision of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the district court is reinstated. To the extent that the district court limited its ruling to preclude the defendant only from presenting any testimony concerning Lim-bic Psychotic Trigger Reaction or make “any mention thereof,” the court properly exercised its gatekeeping function under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, [1076]*1076Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel.

State v. George, 738 So. 2d 1075, 1999 La. LEXIS 447, 1999 WL 123517 (La. 1999).

Pincite

738 So. 2d 1075 (State v. George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related