State v. Gentry

461 N.E.2d 1320, 10 Ohio App. 3d 227, 10 Ohio B. 322, 1983 Ohio App. LEXIS 16045
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 23, 1983
Docket83AP-384
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 461 N.E.2d 1320 (State v. Gentry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gentry, 461 N.E.2d 1320, 10 Ohio App. 3d 227, 10 Ohio B. 322, 1983 Ohio App. LEXIS 16045 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983).

Opinions

*228 Norris, J.

Defendant, Michael Gentry, has filed a notice of appeal and motions for leave to file a delayed appeal and for assignment of counsel. The state has filed nothing in response.

App. R. 5(A) requires that defendant’s motion state adequate reasons for his failure to perfect an appeal as of right and set forth errors which he claims to have occurred. The motion is to be supported by affidavits or parts of the record upon which defendant relies to show the probability that the errors claimed did, in fact, occur.

As his reason for failure to perfect an appeal as of right, defendant asserts that he was unable to perfect an appeal due to his being indigent, and the failure of the trial court to assign counsel. A defendant charged with a serious offense, who is unable to obtain counsel, is entitled to assigned counsel at every stage of the proceedings through appeal as of right, unless he effectively waives his right to counsel. Crim. R. 44(A). Defendant asserts that he made no such waiver. Although defendant has attached no affidavits or other documentation in support of the merits of his motion for leave to file a delayed appeal, we are required, under the circumstances, to grant defendant’s motion for appointment of counsel in order to determine whether or not there is merit in the assertions raised by his motion for leave to appeal. State v. Sims (1971), 27 Ohio St. 2d 79 [56 O.O.2d 45],

Accordingly, defendant’s motion for appointment of counsel is sustained, and. the Franklin County Public Defender is designated as counsel for defendant. Appointed counsel shall be conclusively presumed to have determined to proceed with this appeal unless, within seven days from the date of this decision, counsel files an application to withdraw pursuant to R.C. 120.16(D), supported by appropriate indication of lack of arguable merit to this appeal. Determination of the motion for leave to file a delayed appeal is delayed until compliance by appointed counsel with App. R. 5(A) within twenty days from the date of this decision.

Motion for appointment of counsel sustained.

McCormac, J., concurs. Moyer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fitts v. Eberlin
626 F. Supp. 2d 724 (N.D. Ohio, 2009)
State v. King
485 N.E.2d 280 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
461 N.E.2d 1320, 10 Ohio App. 3d 227, 10 Ohio B. 322, 1983 Ohio App. LEXIS 16045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gentry-ohioctapp-1983.