State v. Gemignani
This text of 545 So. 2d 929 (State v. Gemignani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Gino J. GEMIGNANI, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
*930 Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner.
Victor J. Pellegrino, of Yado, Keel, Nelson & Bergmann, P.A., Tampa, for respondent.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The state initially filed an appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160(a) from an order suppressing respondent's refusal to submit to a field sobriety test and a video tape of his conduct and demeanor following his arrest. In its order the county court certified a question of great public importance. On December 21, 1988, this court issued an order accepting jurisdiction, but because the order on appeal is nonfinal, we treated the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. Upon further consideration, however, we can discern no meaningful distinction between this case and State v. Townsend, 479 So.2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), in which we held that we lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a nonfinal order of a county court suppressing the results of a blood alcohol test. Accordingly, we rescind our prior order and, consistent with Townsend, transfer this matter to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County for disposition within its certiorari jurisdiction in accordance with Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(c)(2) and (3).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
545 So. 2d 929, 1989 WL 49599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gemignani-fladistctapp-1989.