State v. Gee
228 S.W.3d 628, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1064, 2007 WL 2088582
Opinion
ORDER
Hugh Gee appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence of uncharged crimes. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Gee, 228 S.W.3d 628, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1064, 2007 WL 2088582 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
228 S.W.3d 628 (State v. Gee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holman v. Holman
228 S.W.3d 628 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)