State v. Gay
This text of 19 S.C.L. 364 (State v. Gay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
One who is entitled to receive a share of the crop, for his services, on the plantation of another, is not a [365]*365joint tenant, or tenant in common with his employer, of the crop produced. It is exclusively the property of the employer, though he has made an executory contract to allow a certain portion of it to the cropper; and the latter may commjt larceny in stealing a part of the gathered crop.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 S.C.L. 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gay-scctapp-1833.