State v. Gatluak Chuol Bol

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gatluak Chuol Bol

448 S.W.3d 354, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1268, 2014 WL 5841049

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 12, 2014·No. WD 76233·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Gatluak Bol appeals his convictions for driving while intoxicated, section 577.010, RSMo Cum.Supp.2013, and driving without a valid license, section 302.020, RSMo Cum.Supp.2013, and sentences of two years imprisonment and thirty days in the county jail, respectively. He contends that the trial court plainly erred in failing sua sponte to strike a police officer’s testimony regarding disturbances at the houses of Sudanese males. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

[355] The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Gatluak Bol appeals his convictions for driving while intoxicated, section 577.010, RSMo Cum.Supp.2013, and driving without a valid license, section 302.020, RSMo Cum.Supp.2013, and sentences of two years imprisonment and thirty days in the county jail, respectively. He contends that the trial court plainly erred in failing sua sponte to strike a police officer’s testimony regarding disturbances at the houses of Sudanese males. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

[355] The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Gatluak Chuol Bol, 448 S.W.3d 354, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1268, 2014 WL 5841049 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

448 S.W.3d 354 (State v. Gatluak Chuol Bol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.