State v. Gates

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Gates

263 Mont. 43

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 7, 1993

DocketNO. DC-92-154A

StatusPublished

This text of 263 Mont. 43 (State v. Gates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gates, 263 Mont. 43 (Mo. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

On March 2, 1993, the Defendant was sentenced to Count I, forty (40) years for Robbery. The Court further ordered that said sentence be enhanced for the use of a dangerous weapon by an additional sentence of ten (10) years, which shall be served consecutively to the forty (40) year sentence. For Count II, Accountability to Burglary, the court imposed a sentence of twenty (20) years, which shall be served concurrently with the sentence imposed in Count I. Dangerous designation was imposed. The Defendant shall be ineligible for parole and/or participation in a supervised release program until he has served twenty-five (25) years of the sentence. The Defendant shall be given credit for 208 days served.

On May 7,1993, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and proceeded pro se. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

[44]*44DATED this 7th day of May, 1993.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall he affirmed.

The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

Hon. Thomas McKittrick, Chairman, Hon. G. Todd Baugh, and Hon. John Warner, Judges

The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Mr. Gates for representing himself in the matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On March 2, 1993, the Defendant was sentenced to Count I, forty (40) years for Robbery. The Court further ordered that said sentence be enhanced for the use of a dangerous weapon by an additional sentence of ten (10) years, which shall be served consecutively to the forty (40) year sentence. For Count II, Accountability to Burglary, the court imposed a sentence of twenty (20) years, which shall be served concurrently with the sentence imposed in Count I. Dangerous designation was imposed. The Defendant shall be ineligible for parole and/or participation in a supervised release program until he has served twenty-five (25) years of the sentence. The Defendant shall be given credit for 208 days served.