State v. Gaten

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gaten

867 S.W.2d 718, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 2039, 1993 WL 541337

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 28, 1993·No. No. 62225·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon for which he was sentenced, as a prior and persistent offender, to a term of eight years. In his appeal, Defendant raises seven allegations of error. We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no jurisprudential purpose. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon for which he was sentenced, as a prior and persistent offender, to a term of eight years. In his appeal, Defendant raises seven allegations of error. We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no jurisprudential purpose. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Gaten, 867 S.W.2d 718, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 2039, 1993 WL 541337 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

867 S.W.2d 718 (State v. Gaten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.