State v. Gaskins

75 S.E.2d 107, 237 N.C. 438, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 528
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 25, 1953
StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.E.2d 107 (State v. Gaskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gaskins, 75 S.E.2d 107, 237 N.C. 438, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 528 (N.C. 1953).

Opinion

Pee. Curiam.

In criminal cases a defendant may appeal to tbe Supreme Court only from a conviction or from some judgment that is final in its nature. G.S. 15-180; S. v. Blades, 209 N.C. 56, 182 S.E. 714; S. v. Hiatt, 211 N.C. 116, 189 S.E. 124; S. v. Inman, 224 N.C. 531, 31 S.E. 2d 641. The order denying defendant’s motion to remand is purely interlocutory. It is in no sense final. Appeal therefrom was premature, S. v. Hiatt, supra, and must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Inman
31 S.E.2d 641 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
State v. . Blades
182 S.E. 714 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Hiatt
189 S.E. 124 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 S.E.2d 107, 237 N.C. 438, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gaskins-nc-1953.