State v. Gaskins
75 S.E.2d 107, 237 N.C. 438, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 528
Opinion
In criminal cases a defendant may appeal to tbe Supreme Court only from a conviction or from some judgment that is final in its nature. G.S. 15-180; S. v. Blades, 209 N.C. 56, 182 S.E. 714; S. v. Hiatt, 211 N.C. 116, 189 S.E. 124; S. v. Inman, 224 N.C. 531, 31 S.E. 2d 641. The order denying defendant’s motion to remand is purely interlocutory. It is in no sense final. Appeal therefrom was premature, S. v. Hiatt, supra, and must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Gaskins, 75 S.E.2d 107, 237 N.C. 438, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 528 (N.C. 1953).
75 S.E.2d 107 (State v. Gaskins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . Inman
31 S.E.2d 641 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
State v. . Blades
182 S.E. 714 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
State v. . Hiatt
189 S.E. 124 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)