Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Garvin

State v. Garvin

686 A.2d 126, 239 Conn. 950, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 502
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 4, 1996
DocketSC 15578
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 686 A.2d 126 (State v. Garvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Garvin, 686 A.2d 126, 239 Conn. 950, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 502 (Colo. 1996).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 142 (AC 15092), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant’s conviction for two counts of failure to appear arising from a single act did not violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant’s due process rights were not violated by the enforcement of an illusory plea agreement with the sentencing court?”

[951]*951Decided December 4, 1996 Donald D. Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition. Paul J. Ferencek, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Garvin
699 A.2d 921 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 A.2d 126, 239 Conn. 950, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-garvin-conn-1996.