State v. Garrett

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Garrett

547 S.W.3d 158

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 10, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105423

StatusPublished

This text of 547 S.W.3d 158 (State v. Garrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Garrett, 547 S.W.3d 158 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Ronald Garrett ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial convicting him of the Class D felony sexual misconduct involving a child by indecent exposure in violation of Section 566.083 (RSMo 2012 ). Appellant was sentenced to three years' imprisonment and was placed on probation for five years with a suspended execution of sentence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Ronald Garrett ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial convicting him of the Class D felony sexual misconduct involving a child by indecent exposure in violation of Section 566.083 (RSMo 2012 ). Appellant was sentenced to three years' imprisonment and was placed on probation for five years with a suspended execution of sentence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 S.W.3d 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-garrett-moctapp-2018.