State v. Garrett

266 S.W.3d 342, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1416, 2008 WL 4634874
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 2008·No. ED 90642·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*343 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ricardo D. Garrett (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction, following a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 2000. Defendant argues the trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of robbery in the second degree.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Garrett, 266 S.W.3d 342, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1416, 2008 WL 4634874 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

266 S.W.3d 342 (State v. Garrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garrett v. State
342 S.W.3d 907 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)
Freund v. Freund
266 S.W.3d 342 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)