State v. Garner

201 S.E.2d 497, 20 N.C. App. 484, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2477
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided January 9, 1974·No. No. 733SC665·Published

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

At trial defendant offered evidence that he was not present at the time and place the alleged crime was committed. The jury was not instructed that defendant, who relied on an alibi, did not have the burden of proving it. The trial occurred prior to the opinion of our Supreme Court in State v. Hunt, 283 N.C. 617, 197 S.E. 2d 513 and, therefore, the omission of the instruction constituted prejudicial error. State v. Moore, 19 N.C. App. 368, 198 S.E. 2d 760.

New trial.

Judges Morris and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Garner, 201 S.E.2d 497, 20 N.C. App. 484, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2477 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

201 S.E.2d 497 (State v. Garner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hunt
197 S.E.2d 513 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1973)
State v. Moore
198 S.E.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)