State v. Garland

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Garland

408 S.W.3d 248, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 785, 2013 WL 3226864

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 2013·No. No. WD 75292·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The State of Missouri brings this interlocutory appeal challenging an order entered by the Circuit Court of Putnam County granting Nicole Garland’s motion to suppress evidence discovered and seized during the execution of a warrant to search her apartment. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

The trial court’s ruling is affirmed, and the cause is remanded for further proceed[249] ings consistent with this opinion. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The State of Missouri brings this interlocutory appeal challenging an order entered by the Circuit Court of Putnam County granting Nicole Garland’s motion to suppress evidence discovered and seized during the execution of a warrant to search her apartment. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

The trial court’s ruling is affirmed, and the cause is remanded for further proceed[249] ings consistent with this opinion. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Garland, 408 S.W.3d 248, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 785, 2013 WL 3226864 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

408 S.W.3d 248 (State v. Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.