State v. Gardner

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Gardner

99 P. 940, 53 Or. 244

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 P. 940 (State v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gardner, 99 P. 940, 53 Or. 244 (Or. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice King

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant was tried and convicted in the circuit court for conducting in the corporate limits of the City of North Bend a gambling game known as “faro,” contrary to the statutes, etc. This appeal presents the same legal points as determined in State v. Bay, 53 Or. 241 (99 Pac. 939), from which it follows that the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice King

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant was tried and convicted in the circuit court for conducting in the corporate limits of the City of North Bend a gambling game known as “faro,” contrary to the statutes, etc. This appeal presents the same legal points as determined in State v. Bay, 53 Or. 241 (99 Pac. 939), from which it follows that the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 P. 940, 53 Or. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gardner-or-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack