State v. Gardner
28 Mo. 90
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The indictment not only charged the defendant generally in the words of the statute with being “ guilty of an open and notorious act of public indecency, grossly scandalous,” [91] but specified with sufficient certainty the act that constituted the offence.
The indictment was sufficient, and the judgment will be affirmed;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Gardner, 28 Mo. 90 (Mo. 1859).
28 Mo. 90 (State v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Wolf
244 S.W. 962 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1922)
State v. Meysenburg
71 S.W. 229 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
State v. Wilkerson
70 S.W. 478 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)
State v. Perry
91 N.W. 765 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
State v. Burke
52 S.W. 226 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
State v. Morrison
64 Mo. App. 507 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)
Missouri v. Ragsdale
59 Mo. App. 590 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)
State v. Terry
109 Mo. 601 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
State v. James
37 Mo. App. 214 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
State v. Hayward
83 Mo. 299 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)