State v. Gardener

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Gardener

898 So. 2d 1184, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4629, 2005 WL 767003

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 6, 2005

DocketNo. 3D04-1961

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 898 So. 2d 1184 (State v. Gardener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gardener, 898 So. 2d 1184, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4629, 2005 WL 767003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida appeals an order granting defendant’s motion to vacate plea and conviction. We reverse the order because the transcript of the plea colloquy in question demonstrates that the defendant was properly advised of the immigration consequences of his plea. See Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000); Labady v. State, 783 So.2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). There was no legal basis for granting defendant’s motion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida appeals an order granting defendant’s motion to vacate plea and conviction. We reverse the order because the transcript of the plea colloquy in question demonstrates that the defendant was properly advised of the immigration consequences of his plea. See Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000); Labady v. State, 783 So.2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). There was no legal basis for granting defendant’s motion.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

898 So. 2d 1184, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4629, 2005 WL 767003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gardener-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack