State v. Garcia

430 P.3d 241

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 420 P.3d 1077 →

Washington Supreme Court·Decided November 28, 2018·No. No. 96309-6·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its November 27, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the motion to supplement the record is granted and the petition for review is denied.

*242For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the motion to supplement the record is granted and the petition for review is denied.

*242For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

State v. Garcia, 430 P.3d 241 (Wash. 2018).

Pincite

430 P.3d 241 (State v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.