State v. Garcia
503 So. 2d 427, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 671, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12001
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 528 So. 2d 76 →
Opinion
Although the facts set' forth in the defendant’s untraversed sworn motion to dismiss plainly established that she did not conspire to unlawfully traffic in cocaine (as charged in Count II of the information), they did not establish that she was not guilty of the crime of trafficking in cocaine (as charged in Count I of the information). See Saylor v. State, 491 So.2d 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Accordingly, the dismissal of Count I is reversed; the dismissal of Count II is affirmed.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Garcia, 503 So. 2d 427, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 671, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12001 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
503 So. 2d 427 (State v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saylor v. State
491 So. 2d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)