State v. Gammon
This text of 151 A. 542 (State v. Gammon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the September term of this court, 1929, respondent was tried and found guilty of the crime of illegal manufacture of intoxicating liquor, exceptions being noted to certain parts of the charge to the jury.
Upon request of counsel, seasonably made, allowance of time was granted for the preparation and presentation of a bill of exceptions ; and, after holding the respondent to bail, but without pronouncing sentence, the term of court was adjourned.
On December 26, 1929, motion for allowance of exceptions, with consent of the County Attorney, was filed.
At the February term, 1930, of the Superior Court for the same county, certificate of decision from the Law Court was received, with mandate, “Exceptions overruled for want of prosecution, judgment for State.”
Whereupon a motion in arrest of judgment was filed and denied, and to the denial of the motion, exceptions were taken and allowed; sentence was imposed and the respondent admitted to bail, pending decision of the Law Court on the exceptions.
Under rule XIX this Court must dismiss the exceptions; for in a criminal case consideration of a motion in arrest of judgment is waived unless filed during the term at which the accused is found guilty.
Exceptions overruled.
Judgment for the State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 A. 542, 129 Me. 278, 1930 Me. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gammon-me-1930.