State v. Gamble

330 So. 2d 188, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14961
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 14, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1738
StatusPublished

This text of 330 So. 2d 188 (State v. Gamble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gamble, 330 So. 2d 188, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the hereinafter stated reason, we decline to answer the question herein certified to us by the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 4.6, subd. a.

In view of the factual statements, which are sparse in certain material respects, it is clear that this court’s answer to the question would not be dispositive of the entire cause. Niemi v. Mebane Oil Co., Fla.App. 4th, 1974, 303 So.2d 661; Iorio v. State, Fla.App.4th, 1974, 297 So.2d 116; University of Tampa, Inc. v. Hillsborough County, Fla.App.2d, 1974, 287 So.2d 708.

CERTIFICATE DENIED.

McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Iorio v. State
297 So. 2d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
University of Tampa, Inc. v. Hillsborough County
287 So. 2d 708 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Niemi v. Mebane Oil Co.
303 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 So. 2d 188, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gamble-fladistctapp-1976.