State v. Gamble
This text of 330 So. 2d 188 (State v. Gamble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the hereinafter stated reason, we decline to answer the question herein certified to us by the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 4.6, subd. a.
In view of the factual statements, which are sparse in certain material respects, it is clear that this court’s answer to the question would not be dispositive of the entire cause. Niemi v. Mebane Oil Co., Fla.App. 4th, 1974, 303 So.2d 661; Iorio v. State, Fla.App.4th, 1974, 297 So.2d 116; University of Tampa, Inc. v. Hillsborough County, Fla.App.2d, 1974, 287 So.2d 708.
CERTIFICATE DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
330 So. 2d 188, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gamble-fladistctapp-1976.