State v. Galvin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Galvin

204 S.W.3d 324, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1569, 2006 WL 3007724

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 24, 2006·No. No. ED 86714·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Jesse Galvin, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found [325] him guilty of first degree robbery and armed criminal action. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by overruling his motion to suppress testimony regarding identifications by two witnesses and by admitting into evidence a photograph of the lineup viewed by the two witnesses.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Jesse Galvin, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found [325] him guilty of first degree robbery and armed criminal action. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by overruling his motion to suppress testimony regarding identifications by two witnesses and by admitting into evidence a photograph of the lineup viewed by the two witnesses.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Galvin, 204 S.W.3d 324, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1569, 2006 WL 3007724 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

204 S.W.3d 324 (State v. Galvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.